PeCOD Protects Brewery Product from Contamination

Home / Food and Beverage / PeCOD Protects Brewery Product from Contamination
PeCOD Protects Brewery Product from Contamination
Food and Beverage, News
0
1

Food and Beverage companies deliver valuable products to the general public.  It is something we cannot live without.  To ensue the protection of public health it is important for the companies to deliver a safe product that the consumer trusts. Breaking that trust is costly to their business.   Recently a large dairy producer in Canada issued a recall due to a sanitizer contamination in their milk products.

 

https://www.guelphtoday.com/local-news/some-sealtest-milk-recalled-because-it-may-contain-sanitizer-2047446?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

 

Food and beverage producers will generate wastewater in their production and cleaning processes.  This wastewater is usually monitored for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), total suspended solids and pH.  A permit with limits for all these parameters is normally issued to the company.  The local utility or environmental authority will have random sampling intervals to check that the wastewater effluent is meeting discharge limits.  A challenge for the producer is that the BOD test takes 5 days to complete.  As a result, food and beverage companies will often utilize the chemical oxygen demand (COD) surrogate method to have results in 3 hours.   The traditional COD method uses the hazardous chemicals chromium, mercury and concentrated acid.  Unfortunately, these chemicals have the potential to get into the products ultimately purchased and consumed by the public, exactly as happened at the dairy processor.

 

Is there a way to prevent this?  YES!

 

PeCOD replaces the traditional COD testing method, utilizing a green and safe method, hence eliminating the use of hazardous chemicals.  PeCOD also provides a strong correlation to BOD.  PeCOD generates results in 10 minutes, thereby providing an additional advantage through a fast test results.  It is one of the reasons Flying Monkeys Brewery invested in the PeCOD. Flying Monkeys is a growing craft brewery with a wastewater discharge permit. The BOD 5 day method took too long and slowed down production, therefore, they required a method to measure wastewater BOD quickly. They learned of the traditional COD method, but quickly discarded the idea once they learned of the chemicals.  The potential to contaminate product was a significant concern. The priority is to protect their product and maintain consumer trust. The PeCOD COD analyzer was the solution.  Now production is optimized and PeCOD fits the green, local and sustainable mantra so often branded by Craft Brewers.

 

“The real solution to BOD testing is PeCOD”

Robert Menegotto, CEO, MANTECH

 

MANTECH’s primary mission is to “Optimize your Results and Protect our Environment”  We can add Protect Profits and Public Health as well.  The MANTECH PeCOD Analyzer and impact meets the mission goals.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
MANTECH INC
MANTECH INC
Related Posts
Common Water Disinfecting Method May Result In Toxic Byproducts, Study Finds DBPs Image credit: Marissa Lanterman / Johns Hopkins University Toxic and carcinogenic compounds are produced when phenols in drinking water mix with chlorine, the most common chemical used to disinfect drinking water in the U.S. Chlorine, the most common chemical used to disinfect drinking water in the United States, creates previously unidentified toxic byproducts in the very water its meant to disinfect, according to a new study from researchers at Johns Hopkins and the University of California, Berkeley, as well as in Switzerland. The researchers' findings were recently published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology. "There's no doubt that chlorine is beneficial; chlorination has saved millions of lives worldwide from diseases such as typhoid and cholera since its arrival in the early 20th century," says Carsten Prasse, an assistant professor of Environmental Health and Engineering at Johns Hopkins and the paper's lead author. "But that process of killing potentially fatal bacteria and viruses comes with unintended consequences. The discovery of these previously unknown, highly toxic byproducts raises the question of how much chlorination is really necessary." Phenols, chemical compounds that occur naturally in the environment and are abundant in personal care products and pharmaceuticals, are also commonly found in drinking water. When these phenols mix with chlorine, the process creates a large number of byproducts. Current analytical chemistry methods, however, are unable to detect and identify all of these byproducts, some which may be harmful and can cause long-term health consequences, says Prasse. For the study, Prasse and his collaborators added N-α-acetyl-lysine, which is almost identical to the amino acid lysine that makes up many proteins in our bodies, to detect reactive electrophiles, harmful compounds which have been linked to a variety of diseases. The technique of identifying compounds based on their reaction with biomolecules like DNA and proteins is commonly used in the field of toxicology. The researchers first chlorinated water using commercial methods: they added excess chlorine, which ensures sufficient disinfection but also eliminates harmless smell and taste compounds that consumers often complain about. Then the team added the aforementioned amino acid, let the water incubate for one day, and used mass spectrometry, a method of analyzing chemicals, to detect the electrophiles that reacted with the amino acid. Their experiment found the compounds 2-butene-1,4-dial, or BDA, and chloro-2-butene-1,4-dial, or BDA with chlorine attached. BDA is a very toxic compound and a known carcinogen that, until this study, scientists had not detected in chlorinated water before, says Prasse. While Prasse stresses that this is a lab-based study and the presence of these novel byproducts in real drinking water has not been evaluated, the findings also raise the question about the use of alternative methods to disinfect drinking water, including the use of ozone, UV treatment, or simple filtration. "In other countries, especially in Europe, chlorination is not used as frequently, and the water is still safe from waterborne illnesses. In my opinion, we need to evaluate when chlorination is really necessary for the protection of human health and when alternative approaches might be better," Prasse says. He adds: "Our study also clearly emphasizes the need for the development of new analytical techniques that allow us to evaluate the formation of toxic disinfection by-products when chlorine or other disinfectants are being used. One reason regulators and utilities are not monitoring these compounds is that they don't have the tools to find them." Source: Johns Hopkins University
Common Water Disinfecting Method May Result In Toxic Byproducts
NTU Analyzer – T10 Technical Specifications